Tag Archives: Proposition 65

Judge Halts Monsanto Warning Label on First Amendment Grounds

A federal judge blocked California from requiring Monsanto to put warning labels on its Roundup products, ruling there is “insufficient evidence” that the active ingredient causes cancer. When “California seeks to compel businesses to provide cancer warnings, the warnings must be factually accurate and not misleading. As applied to glyphosate, the required warnings are false and misleading,” likely violating Monsanto’s First Amendment rights.… Continue Reading

“3 Takeaways Squeezed Out of Juicer’s Insurance Battle” – Hunton Attorneys Discuss Insurance Coverage for Prop. 65 Claims and Key Takeaways from Recent Set of Washington District Court Rulings.

In an article published in Law360, Hunton & Williams LLP partners Walter Andrews, Malcolm Weiss, and I discuss two recent decisions in Tree Top Inc. v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co., No. 1:15-CV-03155-SMJ, 2017 WL 5664718 (E.D. Wash. Nov. 21, 2017).  There, the Eastern District of Washington rejected an insurer’s attempt to escape insurance coverage … Continue Reading

PFASs: If You Haven’t Heard of Them, You Will Soon

PFASs (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) comprise a group of highly fluorinated manmade compounds that are showing up in drinking water supplies around the country. They are resistant to heat, water and oil, as well as to chemical breakdown. Until recently, PFASs have not been widely regulated. This is changing at both the federal and state levels. … Continue Reading

Challenges in Complying with New Proposition 65 Regulations

Prop. 65 requires warnings be given to Californians prior to exposing them to even minute amounts of any of the 900+ chemicals listed as causing cancer or reproductive harm. The law has been on the books for 30 years. 2016 saw noteworthy amendments to the “safe harbor” warning provisions. These new regulations may be found in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 27, Section 25600. These amendments alter the relationships between entities in the chain of commerce, particularly as between retailers and their vendors, but also place added burdens on all businesses that need to comply with Prop. 65. We expect the recent amendments to the Prop. 65 warning regulations to increase litigation and the numbers of claims filed by plaintiff lawyers. Understanding the regulations and the risks involved is vital in helping businesses reduce their potential liability. … Continue Reading