Skip to content

Menu

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP logo
HomeAboutContact

The Nickel Report

Trends and Developments in Energy and Environmental Law

Home » BlackRock Supports ESG as a New Standard for Investing in its Annual CEO Letters

BlackRock Supports ESG as a New Standard for Investing in its Annual CEO Letters

Smokestacks
By Lisa Montgomery Shelton & David C. McSweeney on January 17, 2020
Posted in Climate, Coal, Mining, Natural Resources, Oil & Gas, Policy

In his annual letter to CEOs, Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock expressed his belief that climate change and sustainability were important considerations in investment risk assessments. Investment based on these concepts is often captured under Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria, commonly called ESG. In his letter, Mr. Fink emphasized that he believes “we are on the edge of a fundamental reshaping of finance.”

BlackRock’s letter builds on the ever-advancing trend in corporate institutional investing over the past decade regarding the examination of corporate valuation and investment risk within the context of ESG issues, otherwise referred to as sustainable investing.

ESG considerations for publicly traded companies have become more focused, and companies often find themselves confronted with inquiries and performance demands from the investment community that involve wide-ranging ESG issues, including those specific to climate change; stakeholder outreach and advocacy; and internal policies, procedures or management systems associated with ESG matters. Although inherently a subjective analysis, more and more investment analysts and managers consider certain baseline sustainability or ESG factors as critical to the separation of a company from industry peers for inclusion in investment portfolios, ranking of companies within a particular industry or subsector, or guiding equity valuations and advocacy.

Fink underscores this in his 2020 letter to CEOs, stating ESG issues “are driving a profound reassessment of risk and asset values. And because capital markets pull future risk forward, we will see changes in capital allocation more quickly than we see changes to the climate itself. In the near future—and sooner than most anticipate—there will be a significant reallocation of capital.” (Emphasis in original). Fink specifically highlights potential impacts from climate change as investment risk, such as the concerns around the unknown scale and scope of government action on climate change, which will generally define the speed with which a move to a low-carbon economy occurs.

ESG issues are often included within diligence inquiries for corporate debt or equity issuances. With ever-increasing frequency, as evidenced by the 2020 BlackRock letter, however, they are a part of other outside stakeholder evaluations. Certain industries have more recently become the focus of ESG related evaluations. For example, subsectors of the energy industry in the United States now frequently receive ESG related inquiries and rankings as they pertain to climate change and other social issues. Fink, in his letter, acknowledges that “[u]nder any scenario, the energy transition will still take decades…[and] despite recent advances, the technology does not yet exist to cost-effectively replace many of today’s essential hydrocarbons.” He stresses the need for government and the private sector to work together to pursue a “fair and just” transition that does not come at the cost of certain parts of society or countries in developing parts of the world.

The general investment thesis assumes that the promotion of ESG performance and initiatives not only supports the ethical management of social considerations but also sustainable profitability. As stated by Fink, he believes “a company cannot achieve long-term profits without embracing purpose and considering the needs of a broad range of stakeholders.” Investment analysts seek information or confirmation from companies on topics that range from how a company incorporates ESG concerns in its risk management programs or presents the issues to senior management and boards of directors, to what efforts companies take to measure or reduce emissions from its operations. Frequently, investment analysts consider whether companies tie executive compensation to ESG-related performance and the degree to which corporate governance and structures are designed to promote transparency of ESG factors.

The long-term trends around ESG issues indicate that ESG focuses will remain a component of how external stakeholders, most importantly, investors, view a company. Companies should address these topics with decisive and careful resolve.

Tags: Environmental and Social Governance, Environmental Social and Governance, Environmental Social Justice, Investment Risk Assessment, Risk Management, Sustainability, Sustainable Investing
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
Backgrounds_Vintage Water bokeh background
Fourth Circuit Ruling Narrowly Construes Administrative Enforcement Bar to Clean Water Act Citizen Suit
July 27, 2022
Government_Supreme Court columns
Federal Court Finds Tort Claims Preempted by CERCLA Consent Decree
May 24, 2022
Policy
Fourth Circuit Holds that Mine Not Liable Under Surface Mining Act When CWA Permit Shield Applies
April 22, 2021

Stay Connected

LinkedIn RSS YouTube Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe

Topics

Archives

Blog Authors Show/Hide

  • Yaniel Abreu
  • Chris Alderman
  • Elizabeth E. Aldridge
  • Walter J. Andrews
  • John J. Beardsworth, Jr.
  • Nancy B. Beck, PhD, DABT
  • Timothy E. Biller
  • J. Tom Boer
  • Lawrence J. Bracken II
  • Shannon S. Broome
  • Karma B. Brown
  • Samuel L. Brown
  • F. William Brownell
  • Julia J. Casciotti
  • Jonathan L. Caulder
  • Michelle G. Chan
  • E. Carter Chandler Clements
  • Gia V. Cribbs
  • Christopher J. Cunio
  • Alexandra B. Cunningham
  • Andrea DeField
  • Meredith K. Doswell
  • Colleen P. Doyle
  • Deidre G. Duncan
  • Frederick R. Eames
  • Clare Ellis
  • Latosha M. Ellis
  • Susan S. Failla
  • Geoffrey B. Fehling
  • Andrea Field
  • Hannah Flint
  • Steven C. Friend
  • Andrew G. Geyer
  • Ian Goldberg
  • Erin Grisby
  • Steven M. Haas
  • Luke Hale
  • Alexandra Hamilton
  • Marisa Harrilchak
  • Jason A. Hill
  • Patrick Jamieson
  • Lori Elliott Jarvis
  • Harry M. “Pete” Johnson, III
  • Kevin W. Jones
  • Dan J. Jordanger
  • Jason J. Kim
  • Scott H. Kimpel
  • Charles H. Knauss
  • Garrett Korbitz
  • Garrett Kral
  • J. Pierce Lamberson
  • Lucinda M. Langworthy
  • Matthew Z. Leopold
  • Brian R. Levey
  • Michael S. Levine
  • Elbert Lin
  • Eric R. Link
  • Nash E. Long
  • David S. Lowman, Jr.
  • Diana P. Martin
  • Jeffrey N. Martin
  • Lorelie S. Masters
  • Patrick M. McDermott
  • Kerry L. McGrath
  • Sean P. McLaughlin
  • Robert J. McNamara
  • Michael J. Messonnier, Jr.
  • Jennifer MikoLevine
  • Todd S. Mikolop
  • Michael J. Mueller
  • Eric J. Murdock
  • Ted J. Murphy
  • William L. Newton
  • Henry V. Nickel
  • Paul T. Nyffeler, PhD
  • Sergio F. Oehninger
  • Peter K. O’Brien
  • Evangeline C. Paschal
  • Kate Perkins
  • Shemin V. Proctor
  • Elizabeth Reese
  • Myles F. Reynolds
  • Doris Rodríguez
  • Brent A. Rosser
  • Arthur E. Schmalz
  • Penny A. Shamblin
  • Michael R. Shebelskie
  • George P. Sibley, III
  • Joseph C. Stanko
  • Javaneh S. Tarter
  • Mark J. Thurber
  • Linda C. Trees
  • Andrew J. Turner
  • Emily Burkhardt Vicente
  • Gregory R. Wall
  • Malcolm C. Weiss
  • Michelle-Ann C. Williams
  • Susan F. Wiltsie

Recent Update

  • Federal Judge Rules for Vineyard Wind in First of Four Pending Actions
  • EPA Releases Proposed Rule under TSCA to Ban or Restrict Most Uses of Methylene Chloride
  • EPA Proposes to Give Louisiana Authority for CO2 Injection Permits Under Condition that State Permit Process Includes Robust Environmental Justice Analysis and Outreach
  • Biden Administration Changes White House Regulatory Review
  • New Environmental Justice Executive Order Includes Additional Requirements and Accountability Measures for Federal Agency Environmental Justice Efforts

Links & Resources

  • PipelineLaw.com
  • Energy
  • Environmental
  • Environmental Compliance, Litigation & Defense
  • Regulatory
  • Energy Sector Security Team
  • Air
  • Water
  • Climate Change
  • California’s Proposition 65
  • Chemicals, Products, & Hazardous Materials
  • Pipeline

The Nickel Report

Attorney Advertising

Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Regulatory Air Water Energy Sector Security Team PipelineLaw.com California's Proposition 65 Climate Change Chemicals, Products, & Hazardous Materials Pipeline test link LinkedIn Environmental Compliance, Litigation & Defense Environmental Energy RSS YouTube Follow Us on Twitter
Privacy NoticeDisclaimerCookies

About Our Practice

Hunton Andrews Kurth attorneys have represented clients in nearly every type of matter in virtually every industry sector from natural gas, chemicals, products and hazardous materials, extractive industries, food and beverage, technology, manufacturing, health care, and numerous others on issues related to: climate change law and policy, environmental enforcement defense, water, natural resources and permitting. Our clients benefit from our interdisciplinary approach that combines subject-matter knowledge with skilled advocacy by experienced practitioners at the administrative, legislative, trial and appellate levels.

Copyright © 2023, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo